Which example best demonstrates a constitutional government?

A constitutional government is characterized by a system of rules and principles that governs the nation, restricting the powers of government officials and ensuring that they operate within defined legal bounds. The idea is that the government is accountable to the law, and it must adhere to established procedures and principles that protect individual rights and prevent the abuse of power.

When option A states that it "places limits on the power of elected officials," it highlights a foundational aspect of constitutional governance. Constitutions typically outline the powers of different branches of government, creating a system of checks and balances. This ensures that no single branch becomes too powerful, and that the rights of citizens are safeguarded. This structure is essential in maintaining a democratic society where leaders are held accountable for their actions.

The other choices do not reflect the principles of a constitutional government. For instance, allowing the majority to govern without restrictions can lead to a "tyranny of the majority," where minority rights may be overlooked. Expanding the powers of the executive branch may lead to an imbalance and a concentration of power, undermining constitutional limits. Finally, permitting arbitrary decision-making by leaders goes against the very essence of a constitutional framework, which aims to provide predictability and transparency in government actions.